🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.